Holiday Guest Post: Spreading our @#!% Around

In honor of that amazing American holiday we celebrate today–the day we reimagine our nation’s history to be one of generosity and mutual exchange, the day we eat too much, take long naps, and then eat some more, the day each year we force even the youngest among us to recount something for which they are thankful before they can take a seat at the table–in honor of that day, I’m serving up a little dose of guilt to dollop on your pumpkin pie. (Shocker, I know.) So if you don’t want to feel a little bit guilty, you should just shut your laptop right now.

For those of you still reading, there’s one more warning that the following post needs stamped on it. It’s for mature audiences only. By that I mean that the writer uses some strong language. He grew up on a farm and, well, calls a spade a spade. Today’s essay is adapted from a talk originally delivered to college students on our local campus last Friday, in an attempt to raise awareness about the Fair Trade movement. (Check out the Resources page here at Texas Schmexas if you don’t know what “fair trade” means.)

So there’s one word that the writer uses a few times–it rhymes with “quit”–for emphasis. I decided not to change his word choice because it wasn’t as effective without it. If you are bothered by strong language, don’t keep reading. I’m serious about that. As a result of the strong language, I am requiring those of you receiving this via e-mail or from the Schmexas homepage to “click to read more” in order to continue.

So here we go.

Plants, especially corn, need nitrogen to grow.  Fortunately, farmers have always had an excellent source of nitrogen to dump on their fields: cow manure.  Manure, which is extremely high in nitrogen, as well as other beneficial compounds, gets spread on the fields, and everything grows much better.  Since, historically, the same farmers that grew corn and other products always had cows, and since one thing that cows produce a lot of is manure, there was always plenty of it to put on the fields, and corn grew quite well.

In 1947, a huge munitions plant in Muscle Shoals, Alabama, found that it had a massive amount of leftover ammonium nitrate, a key ingredient for making explosives during the recently ended war.  After a vigorous debate, agronomists in the Department of Agriculture convinced the government that this nitrate should be used on farmland, especially in the Midwest, to increase the yields of corn that we could get.  With this new massive influx of nitrogen, farmers found that new hybrids of corn could grow much closer together, which meant that they could just specialize in corn and not bother with cows at all anymore.  The cows, then, all got shipped to California or Wisconsin or Idaho or New York, large dairy states, while the corn all got grown in Iowa and Illinois.

Now whether this is ultimately a better food system or not is beside the point today; certainly it has done more than any other revolution to increase the amount of food that we can grow.  The point, rather, is that this rather wonderful new division of labor ended up leading to two major problems: too much free nitrogen in the Mississippi basin, and too much shit in the dairy states.

The easily applied nitrogen, all made from fossil fuels, flows into the Mississippi and then into the Gulf of Mexico.  Another plant that likes nitrogen almost as much as corn is algae, and the wild growth of algae in the Gulf has created a hypoxic zone, literally a dead zone where essentially nothing lives except for the algae, that is as big as the state of New Jersey and growing.

The shit, on the other hand, no longer has anywhere safe to go either.  Lacking enough nearby fields that need such massive dumps of fertilizer, which would probably kill anything growing there, many really big cattle farms must store the crap for long periods of time in giant containers that contain such massive amounts of nitrogen as to be toxic to human beings.  At last estimate, over a million people in the US drink water that has so much nitrogen from cow manure specifically that it is dangerous to their health.

In short, we have taken nature’s elegant solution, where the plant feeds the cow and the cow feeds the plant, and have turned it into two serious problems: too little shit in one place, and too much shit in another.

In the exact same way, we have taken God’s elegant solution for the care of the world, in which people everywhere might ideally spend meaningful lives laboring for their own good and the good of those around them and eat the products of that labor, and turned it into two related problems: we have too much shit in the rich countries, and far too little everywhere else.

Let us dream together for just a minute, let us ignore what is possible, politically and economically, and dream of a world like God may have wanted it to be.

  • Every person in that world would have a job that she desired to do well, not because it made her more money or led to her advancement, but because she believed in the good of what she was doing.
  • Every person in that world would eat food grown more by the sun than by fossil fuels, picked by those who desired to labor rather than those forced to labor, and prepared by chefs who loved the food as much as those who grew it.
  • Every person in that world would see his life as part of a broader and more important story that filled his actions with significance, and his life with joys and sorrows of depth and import.
  • No one would go hungry or starve, as 211,300 people, nearly 1 in 7, do, in Central and Eastern Kentucky right now.
  • No one would watch their children die of hunger-related causes, as about 15,000 mothers do every day.

This would be God’s elegant solution, where my dependencies are met by your care and labor, and your dependencies are met by mine.

We do not live in that world.  Instead, we live in a world gone mad.

  • Only in a world gone mad do Americans have so much food that by some estimates the number one preventable cause of death in America is having too many calories, while the number one health risk worldwide is hunger.
  • Only in a world gone mad do Americans suffer from the sense that they cannot have a meaningful life, that there is nothing worth doing, while the rest of the world has no work to do.
  • Only in a world gone mad do Americans spend an average of almost $700 on Christmas presents for each other, while 80% of the world lives on less than $10/day.
  • Only in a world gone mad do we walk into grocery stores that, on average, have over 35,000 items to choose from, while almost a billion people in the world do not have enough to eat.
  • Only in a world gone mad would Americans use more water in a five minute shower than the poor of the world use in a day (and their water is not nearly so clean!).
  • Only in a world gone mad do the poorest 40% of the global population get 5% of the global income, while the richest 20% gets 75% of the world’s income.  And by the way, we, and pretty much all of the Occupy folks around the country, are in that top 20%.

Clearly, in America, we’ve got too much shit, while the rest of the world does not have nearly enough.

How many shirts and shoes and pants do you have in your closet, and how much did they cost if you actually added them all up?

St. Basil the Great, an early theologian, was trying to understand Jesus’ command to give away our cloak when we are asked.  He writes:

When someone steals another’s clothes, we call him a thief.  
Should we not give the same name to one who could clothe 
the naked and does not?  The bread in your cupboard belongs 
to the hungry… the money you hoard belongs to the poor.

Or if you prefer a scriptural passage, consider 1 John 3:17:

How does God’s love abide in anyone who has 
the world’s goods and sees a brother or sister 
in need and yet refuses help?

These are hard words, who can hear them?

So what should we do?

My advice to you is simple: you will be better off if you get rid of some of your shit.

[There’s a second part to this post, my friends. Stay tuned for tomorrow’s “Black Friday” entry, which focuses on putting our money where our mouth is.]

Advertisements

4 comments on “Holiday Guest Post: Spreading our @#!% Around

  1. Chad Gafford says:

    Maybe the bleeding heart liberal writer of this post should sell his computer, cancel his internet and give all of the proceeds to the “rest of the world”. Intead of talking about how spoiled and “shitty” we americans are, maybe, the writer could hit a knee and thank the author and perfecter of our faith for the abundant blessings that he enjoys. Go take a nice long warm shower and thank God for that opportunity. THEN, when the opportunity arises, pay it forward. Being blessed beyond belief does NOT deamonize those that are blessed.

    • elizabeth says:

      Hi, Chad. Thanks for commenting! I think all voices are important in this discussion, and your point about us being incredibly blessed is certainly valuable and needs to be shared. I’m glad you stopped by and took the time to share your thoughts.

      The writer of this post is actually not a “bleeding heart liberal,” at least not compared to the liberals I know, but I agree with you that there are lots of ways to approach this topic. Since this “essay” was originally delivered to college students as a speech, I personally think that it’s valuable in pointing out how spoiled we–and they–are. I’m sure it shows my own bias that I didn’t read any demonization into this post–and I’m pretty sure that any “guilt” in it isn’t much different than the sort of “guilt” I tend to use here at Texas Schmexas on a regular basis to try to help my readers think through what I see as difficult truths of living a life commited to Christ. (Of course, maybe I myself am a bleeding heart liberal!)

      Also, back to this writer’s points, it seems to me that most of the early Christian writers whom I’ve come across (though there are certainly many I haven’t!) tend to emphasis some of these same points about the dangers of accumulating too much wealth. Not that it’s inherently bad, evil, or demonic, but that it does take hold of us and make it difficult to really “see” and care for the “least of these” that both the Old and New Testaments call us to serve. However, since I’m a sensible person, I’m happy to entertain opposite views on this. 🙂

      Lastly, I could definitely be wrong–or it could just be a result of my own community–but I don’t think most of us as American Christians struggle with acknowledging how blessed we are. We are blessed, there is no doubt about it.

      Thanks again for stopping by, Chad. I always appreciate being asked, even implicitly, to think through my own convictions on particular topics. This is one of those topics!

      –Elizabeth

      PS Anyone else what to share your responses to the above post?

  2. elizabeth says:

    Chad, there was one other thing I meant to mention and forgot in my original reply. This “talk” was part of a series of talks given throughout the day. I think there were 8 in all. The one just before this was delivered by a religion professor and dealt with the dueling narratives of “Black Friday” and “Good Friday.” And one soon after this one dealt with Jesus’ parable about burying your talents. My point in mentioning this is that you can be assured that throughout the day, the talks were balanced out with a variety of view points, some primarily theological, some Scriptural, some philosophical, etc., but all dealing with social and economic justice in an effort to raise awareness about fair trade. (Hence, the next post here on Texas Schmexas where the above author goes on to deal solely with explaining what “fair trade” is.)

    Elizabeth

  3. Darla says:

    Chad’s response (left at 3:52 a.m.???) to the post about social and economic justice reflects how uncomfortable that post made him. His response was aggressive and accusatory and extreme. That always says to me that person is on the defense/trying to distract from the original point being made. Demonize??? Where in the world did that come from? And, finally, I think the word “shit” is very powerful and expressive. I acknowledge it is not a nice word to say according to those who define what is and is not nice to say. But it is so descriptive and clearly conveys the speakers meaning. I had a necklace years ago that my sister gave me that from a distance looked like this fine silver thread curled and looped around. When one got really close you could see that it said “Shit happens”. I rest my case.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s